Steven Soderbergh has found this odd place in Hollywood where he is able to make the films that he wants to make. He experiments with the super independent with films like “Bubble”, but then will show that he has mainstream appeal with the “Ocean” films. This is the guy that made an epic chronicling the life of Che Guevara and then made male strippers into a blockbuster hit. So it should come as no surprise that he has chosen to tell the dramatic and complicated life of Liberace with “Behind the Candelabra”, because of course he did.


Review: The Bourne Legacy
I’m a huge fan of the ‘Bourne’ series. The first film set the tone, the second two solidified its unique style into an excellent modern action film. The everyman transformed into a super soldier, an expert operative running from the corrupt government organization that created him.
The Bourne Supremacy for all intents and purposes closed the book on Jason Bourne, but, just like any successful franchise, the powers that be, and the fans want more. So how do you make a Bourne movie without Paul Greengrass and Matt Damon? You tell the story of one of the other members of the top secret Government organization that created these super soldiers.
This outing is written and directed by Tony Gilroy, the screenwriter of the previous films, and stars Jeremy Renner, who is quickly on his way of becoming a household name and action star in his own right.
The film opens with Aaron Cross (Renner), hiking over a mountain in a training assignment. With Operation Treadstone and Operation Blackbriar public and a potential embarrassment thanks to what happened in the previous films, the powers that be decide that Operation Outcome, the latest in the Department of Defense black ops program needs to be reevaluated. Eric Byer (Edward Norton) is brought in to assess the situations, and determines that terminating the program is the best decision. Which results in assassinations and literal termination of all those involved in the program. Caught in the middle is research scientist Dr. Marta Shearing (Rachel Weisz), as well as Aaron Cross, who manages to survive a drone strike.
We learn that Operation Outcome operatives are required to take a pill that gives them the intelligence and strength that we’ve seen in the other films. The subjects are reliant on these “chems,” and the consequences of not having them are disastrous (or so we’re told). The way to counteract the reliance on the pills, is to be “viraled off,” which makes them not have to take the pill. Which is why Cross makes his way to find Shearing.
The film differs in that Cross lacks some of the baggage that Jason Bourne suffered from. It seems that at this stage of the project, they’ve maintained better control of their operatives, and that making them reliant on the “chems” is what keeps them in control.
The film, while maintaining the double crossing and high tech style of the previous films, definitely

doesn’t look anything like any of the other Bourne movies. Greengrass’ fly on the wall, almost documentary style of filming the action is replaced with a far more traditional style of cinematography. The action is standard, nothing stands out as far as set pieces. While I don’t feel like they phoned this one in, everything just kind of feels like business as usual. As far as character development, the main characters connection wasn’t as tight or as believable as the previous films, and Cross feels much more one-dimensional than Bourne.
‘Legacy’ maintains its mystery up until the last act, that’s where things really start to fall apart. The finale action scene just doesn’t feel like it holds up to the standard thats been set for the series, and its ending isn’t satisfactory. Movies are free to leave openings for sequels, but this felt far too unresolved.
All-in-all, its a decent action movie, but we’ve come to expect far more from the Bourne series. Let’s hope like the first trilogy, this one sorts itself out the second time. If there is one.

Film Review: We Bought A Zoo
First, let me tell you that I hate reviews. It spoils a film and sets your mind in place to experience things almost as the reviewer did. I try to go into every film fresh and only off of the knowledge of the trailer. Secondly, I kind of hate this time of year and how the Hollywood hype machine starts giving hype to every film to win an Oscar. I enjoy what I enjoy and kind of like to see films before they get nominated.
Anyways, I am going to write up a review on Cameron Crowe’s first film in 6 years: We Bought A Zoo. Cameron Crowe likes to create a certain type of film: a man going through a transitional period being ushered into it by a woman. Depending on your view of the world this is either real or fantasy. Or better yet, whether women like the ones in Crowe films actually exist. John Cusack lost his innocence in Say Anything when his high school girlfriend broke up with him and left him with a pen, but they wound up together. Tom Cruise left behind the world of an arrogant sports agent to be with Renee Zellweger in Jerry Maguire. Patrick Fugit was led into adulthood by Kate Hudson in Almost Famous. And Orlando Bloom grieved about his dead dad while being soothed by Kirsten Dunst in Elizabethtown. Although, Cameron Diaz drove Tom Cruise off a bridge in Vanilla Sky.
In We Bought A Zoo, Matt Damon plays Ben, a dad of 2, who has just lost his wife to an illness. You get the precocious young daughter, Rosie, who is pretty much this film’s Jonathan Lipnicki (Jerry Maguire). And he has a son, Dylan, who is dealing with his anger by acting out in school with grim drawings. The son finally gets expelled from high school and Ben quits his job as only you can do in a Cameron Crowe film and the film gets going.
Ben is being shown houses by Curb Your Enthusiam’s Leon (J.B. Smoove) who dials down that character’s profanities and actually got laughs from the youngsters in the crowd. Youngsters in the crowd? I’ll get to that later.
Ben decides to buy a house that also has a run down zoo that hasn’t been open in ages and wants to give his 2 kids “the unique American experience”. Dylan hates it and his dad. Rosie loves it. Ben meets Scarlett Johannson’s character, Kelly, who still works at the run down zoo where the animals are still kept. At almost the same time Ben’s son meets Kelly’s cousin in the film and you can see Crowe setting the stage for salvation.
Elle Fanning plays the love interest, Lily, to Ben’s son. She has an impeccable fresh faced quality and is radiant with beauty and eternal optimism. The way that the 2 characters interacted was very honest and made me feel giddy with nostalgia of young love. You could see Dylan’s anger diminish a little bit with more visits from Lily where she brings him a sandwich and they awkwardly make conversation.
Ben and Kelly have a working relationship with a little bit of sexual tension going on. How can Ben go on grieving about his wife, while the beautiful Kelly shovels elephant shit nearby? The 2 have a drunken encounter that is sure to be quoted by romantics for many years to come. Nothing happens there, but we follow Ben as cries at pictures of his wife on his laptop. Is he ready to move on? Can he successfully raise 2 kids and a zoo?
A subplot in the film deals with an ailing older tiger named Snar. Ben and Kelly fight over putting him to sleep. Ben wants to keep him alive and you can kind of understand what that means just by reading this. The tiger represents Ben’s dead wife that he doesn’t want to see give up and pass away. Regardless, Ben gives in and lets the vet come in to put the tiger down. Around this time it is apparent that this also signals Ben’s moving on from grieving about his wife.
Ben and Dylan have a huge argument about everything and it felt extremely real and I’m sure every father and son have had something similar happen to them at some point in their life. {This is where the film has the most in common with Vanilla Sky. Remember the scenes with Tom Cruise and Kurt Russell who played his dad?} Ben even brings up Lily and gives him some fatherly advice to rectify things with her “All you need is 20 seconds and insane courage, and I promise you something great will come of it.”
Both women successfully help Ben and Dylan make the transition from grief and anger, respectively, to salvation. One could argue that Crowe is quite the romantic and champion of salvation in the form of a beautiful woman.
I enjoyed the film quite a bit and was glad that it felt like an old fashioned family film that wasn’t afraid to include the big themes in life that might upset the children. Not too surprisingly, but this was based off of a true story. This is probably Crowe’s first family film. Some, myself even, tend to think of Jerry Maguire as a family film, but that’s probably because we keep catching it on TBS and they cut out the scene where Cruise is banging Kelly Preston. How can that scene exist in a film with a kid who knows how much the human head weighs? Well, that’s life.
Epilogue: How can I write about a Cameron Crowe film and not discuss the soundtrack? Well, if you made it this far congratulations and here we go. Tom Petty, Wilco, Bob Dylan, Cat Stevens, Temple Of The Dog, & Neil Young fill out the soundtrack. Jonsi from Sigur Ros scores the film.

PREVIEW REVIEW: September 9, 2011
BUCKY LARSON: BORN TO BE A STAR
This movie puzzles me. I feel a conflict. I feel compelled to not like this movie; to think it looks stupid…and well, it does…but for some reason, there are parts of the preview that look sort of funny. I actually laughed at the scene where a thick mustached Kevin Nealon is screaming at a crying Bucky Larson, asking him if he stole his grapes. I don’t know why that struck me as funny, but it did. Perhaps this dumb looking movie will actually be funny? The R-rating, as always, intrigues me and the dude playing Bucky Larson, Nick Swardson, is sort of funny on Reno 9-11. I’m torn on this one.
PREDICTION: 2 1/2 stars
CONTAGION
I love Steven Soderbergh. He makes some pretty tough to watch movies sometimes, I will say, but aside from the Oceans movies, they’re all generally really good and different. I think he just captivates me because he likes to experiment. All his movies are different. He’s made comedy (The Informant!), thriller (Traffic, Out Of Sight), epics (The Argentine, Guerrilla), noir (The Good German), sci fi (Solaris) and on and on. He deserved his Oscar for Traffic. That movie was just incredible. So I like the guy as a filmmaker. This seems to be one of the biggest films he has ever made. The Oceans movies were filled with A-list stars, but always seemed small in scale. This is a global set film, with a shit ton of stars as well. I know Outbreak was fucking 16 years ago (jesus that makes me feel old), but it still seems like its the pinnacle of killer virus movies. I suppose we are in need of a modern one. This one looks very similar, but sort of bleaker and darker. From the trailer, it seems like Matt Damon is the lead and I’ll tell you, his reaction to the news that his wife is dead (its not a spoiler fuckface, its on the trailer!) is pretty amazing. The confusion when he asks to speak with her after the doctor has already told him that she died is really great acting. Soderbergh knows how to direct actors. The man gave fucking Julia Roberts an Oscar, so he knows what he’s doing. I love Kate Winslet and Jude Law as well, so I think this movie will be something pretty epic and special. Looking forward to it.
PREDICTION: 3 1/2
WARRIOR
When I first saw this trailer, I thought “Didn’t they just fucking make The Fighter?” This is the MMA version of The Fighter, I guess, only with worse acting and probably a lamer story. I watched MMA once and was bored to tears. They kicked a little bit and then got each other in some grapple hold for about 15 mins before one of them tapped out. Yawn. Give me Hulk Hogan vs. Macho Man Randy Savage over that shit any day of the week. I would say the only reason to see this movie would be for Nick Nolte. I can never get enough of that crazy fuck. He is one of the most underrated actors ever to work. If you’re interested in acting, I implore you to watch every Nick Nolte movie that you can, yes, even Three Fugitives! The man is just so intense in every role, even the shitty ones. The man took heroin to get into the role of a drug addict for The Good Thief!!! He’s the only reason why someday I will see this inevitable turd.
PREDICTION: 2 stars
DVD Review: The Adjustment Bureau
‘The Adjustment Bureau” is writer George Nolfi’s debut feature. Known for his spec screenplay Honor Among Thieves (which was adapted into Oceans Twelve), Nolfi shows strength in this all new Philip K. Dick adaptation.
David Norris (Matt Damon), is a young politician running for Senate in New York. Charming, a clear favorite, but haunted by the mistakes of his past, David loses to his opponent. While in the bathroom preparing his concession speech, he runs into a young woman, Elise (Emily Blunt) who is hiding in one of the stalls. After this chance encounter, David goes out to make a speech from the heart, which sets him up for the next election.
We are introduced the the “Adjustment Bureau,” early on, though, their purpose is not quite clear. Harry (Anthony Mackie), apparently a member of this group, is told that David’s coffee has to be spilled on his shirt no later than 7:05am. Harry falls asleep, and David makes the bus, and runs into Elise – an encounter that is not part of the “plan” (more on that later). So now, the Adjustment Bureau has to take actions to put things back in order, and make sure David and Elise never meet again. This is when we are introduced to Richardson, played by John Slattery, who’s just as dry and sarcastic has Roger Sterling on ‘Mad Men.’ A total scene stealer – hard to do when opposite Damon and Blunt.
The film purports that we all have a plan, written long ago by the “Chairman,” and if we deviate, things get out of order. So to keep things on track, certain, influential people, are assigned “case officers,” that make adjustments keeping things in line. As ridiculous as this premise is, its strength is, it doesn’t go into very much detail of who these people are, and why. It just is the way it is, and as the audience, it keeps things in line.
At its core, ‘The Adjustment Bureau,’ is a fantastical date movie. Matt Damon and Emily Blunt have an amazing chemistry, and you truly believe that they want to be together. While advertised as something more along the lines of Bourne Identity meets Inception, the film is much lighter in tone, and actually has some genuine funny moments – a feat owed strictly to the talented Damon.
All in all, I think this is a great film worth renting, I enjoyed the escapist sci-fi fun of it, its tight, well acted, and all around very enjoyable.

Review: The Adjustment Bureau
‘The Adjustment Bureau” is writer George Nolfi’s debut feature. Known for his spec screenplay Honor Among Thieves (which was adapted into Oceans Twelve), Nolfi shows strength in this all new Philip K. Dick adaptation.
David Norris (Matt Damon), is a young politician running for Senate in New York. Charming, a clear favorite, but haunted by the mistakes of his past, David loses to his opponent. While in the bathroom preparing his concession speech, he runs into a young woman, Elise (Emily Blunt) who is hiding in one of the stalls. After this chance encounter, David goes out to make a speech from the heart, which sets him up for the next election.
We are introduced the the “Adjustment Bureau,” early on, though, their purpose is not quite clear. Harry (Anthony Mackie), apparently a member of this group, is told that David’s coffee has to be spilled on his shirt no later than 7:05am. Harry falls asleep, and David makes the bus, and runs into Elise – an encounter that is not part of the “plan” (more on that later). So now, the Adjustment Bureau has to take actions to put things back in order, and make sure David and Elise never meet again. This is when we are introduced to Richardson, played by John Slattery, who’s just as dry and sarcastic has Roger Sterling on ‘Mad Men.’ A total scene stealer – hard to do when opposite Damon and Blunt.
The film purports that we all have a plan, written long ago by the “Chairman,” and if we deviate, things get out of order. So to keep things on track, certain, influential people, are assigned “case officers,” that make adjustments keeping things in line. As ridiculous as this premise is, its strength is, it doesn’t go into very much detail of who these people are, and why. It just is the way it is, and as the audience, it keeps things in line.
At its core, ‘The Adjustment Bureau,’ is a fantastical date movie. Matt Damon and Emily Blunt have an amazing chemistry, and you truly believe that they want to be together. While advertised as something more along the lines of Bourne Identity meets Inception, the film is much lighter in tone, and actually has some genuine funny moments – a feat owed strictly to the talented Damon.
All in all, I think this film is a great alternative to the pre-Spring season doldrums, and at any other time, I’d recommend it as a rental. But I did enjoy this film quite a bit, its tight, well acted, and all around enjoyable.
IFFBoston 2010 Review: Teenage Paparazzo
‘Teenage Paparazzo’ is a great documentary from actor Adrian Grenier about 14 year old Austin Visschedyk, a young paparazzo. Going into the film, I wasn’t sure what I was going to see, I’m familiar with Grenier as an actor, but as far as his directing skills, I was curious to see what he’d done with this very captivating premise. The documentary goes much further then just about Austin, it delves deep into the paparazzi culture, and even examines our obsession with celebrities.
The film opens with a quick background on Grenier, and how he is in the position that he is now, a celebrity that has to deal with the constant snapping of the paparazzi. One day, Grenier is leaving an event, and a young boy runs up to him with a camera. At first, he assumes its just another fan. Once he’s hit with the snapping of 75 shots, he realizes, this kid is a paparazzi.
Grenier tracks Austin down, and turns the cameras on him. Following him as he goes about his life, and interviewing the various people in and around him, including other paparazzos. The film is insightful and looks at many different aspects of the culture.
A great part of that is the journey of a photo, which is outlined for us in detail. For example, if one of these professionals snags a quick picture of Paris Hilton walking out of a coffee shop, how its downloaded, uploaded, and on a picture editors desk for a tabloid before she even gets home. It’s quite remarkable.
The films opening I’d say is its weakest part. It begins a bit on the self-indulgent side. I will admit, it is hard to not come off self-indulgent when you narrate the opening of a film telling us why you’re famous. But, I’m sure there are people who don’t know who Adrian Grenier is, and why he would be a “victim” of the paparazzi. Thankfully, we move right past this, and it only strengthens from there.
It is clearly evident that Grenier truly cared about this story. It apparent when he voices concerns that once Austin grows out of the cute, “I’m a 13 year old paparazzi,” he’s going to be wasting his talents as a photographer. The actor actively goes out of his way to encourage Austin to explore his talent in other ways, in hopes that he can make something even more out of his life.
Another great sequence in the film is when Grenier goes out of his way to test the lies many tabloid publications make up based on the photos they receive. He stages a shoot with himself and Paris Hilton, just to see how it comes out on the other end. And of course, the rumors fly that there is a burgeoning relationship between the too.
The most touching part of the film is the friendship and bond Grenier builds with Austin. Its amazing to see how this taste of fame effects Austin through out the filming process, as he is very different at the end of the film then from when we first meet him.
My favorite sequence in the film had to be the point where Grenier decides to get his own camera, and see what things were like on that side of the world. I have to admit, if this hadn’t happened, I would have left the theater extremely disappointed.
‘Teenage Paparazzo,’ features great appearances by a wealth of different personalities, Matt Damon, Eva Longoria, and Alec Baldwin show up giving their opinion on everything from paparazzi to literally how different your life is when you are in the public eye.
Baldwin makes an amazing statement, he discusses how media conglomerates profit both from his work as an actor, and his personal life. For example, while he was working on the Departed, he’s doing the talk show circuit, appearing on shows produced by Time Warner, whose WB arm produced the film. But then, one of the company’s other outlets, TMZ, is dragging his name through the mud for the scandal with the angry voicemail he left his daughter. So on one end their profiting off his work, and on the other, their profiting by exploiting a situation in his personal life. Showbiz…there is nothing like it.
I really enjoyed ‘Teenage Paparazzo,’ and I’m glad to see its been picked up by HBO Films. It is a great film that offers a lot of insight to the world of these photographers, and gives you a feel for what its like to be both behind and in front of the camera.
DVD Review: The Informant
There is no way to get past how ridiculous Matt Damon looks in ‘The Informant.’ He’s gained weight, changed his hair, and fits the role of the awkward bi-polar whistleblower perfectly. I just wanted to get the obligatory “oh my god Matt Damon is so fat” out of the way. ‘The Informant!’ is a comedy directed by Steven Soderbergh based on the book by Kurt Eichenwald. A true story, ‘The Informant’ is the tale of Mark Whiticare (Matt Damon), a rising-exec at Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), a company that makes additives for food and beverages.
Whiticare tells his bosses he received a call from a contact at one of their competitors, that ADM had a mole within their ranks that was sabotaging their lysine production. Lysine being the division that Whiticare is in charge of, which had been losing money for months. Whiticare’s boss decides the best course of action would be to install a wire-tap in Whiticare’s phone, just in case his contact called him again.
Under the insistence of his wife, Whiticare reveals to the FBI agent that ADM was routinely meeting with price competitors to fix the price of lysine. That is when things really start to fall apart, as Whiticare bumbles along, recording hundreds of hours of tape and video in an effort to implicate his bosses in the price-fixing scheme.
The film is being marketed a lot goofier then it actually is, though there is an overall comical tone, the subject is a bit serious. Whiticare is a complicated character, who isn’t exactly what he seems either. Damon embodies the role so well, and you spend half the film shaking your head at ever foolish decision Whiticare makes.
The music in the film is delightful, jazzy, and fits the dark yet light hearted tone of the film. The best part of the film is how well Soderbergh and his production designer make this feel like a period piece. The entire film takes place from the early 90s to just a few years ago. It is so convincing, from the computer systems, to the cars, and haircuts, top notch work. Think of the movie as the Insider meets Erin Brockovich, just way funnier.
Greengrass Says No To “Bourne” 4
Director Paul Greengrass, director of “The Bourne Supremacy,” and “The Bourne Ultimatum,” says he won’t be directing the fourth Jason Bourne movie. Here’s what Greengrass said about his decision not to do a fourth movie:
“You won’t find a more devoted supporter of the Bourne franchise than me… I’m very proud of those (Bourne) films and feel they express everything I most passionately believe about the possibility of making quality movies in the mainstream. My decision to not return a third time as director is simply about feeling the call for a different challenge… Jason Bourne existed before me and will continue, and I hope to remain involved in some capacity as the series moves on.”
There is no word on who will helm a fourth film. It’s also not known if the several script that have been in development for a fourth movie will be used or if another new script will be commissioned.
Paul Greengrass will most definitely be missed. Whoever they choose to head Bourne 4, that person has some large shoes to fill.
Review: The Informant!
There is no way to get past how ridiculous Matt Damon looks in ‘The Informant.’ He’s gained weight, changed his hair, and fits the role of the awkward bi-polar whistleblower perfectly. I just wanted to get the obligatory “oh my god Matt Damon is so fat” out of the way. ‘The Informant!’ is a comedy directed by Steven Soderbergh based on the book by Kurt Eichenwald. A true story, ‘The Informant’ is the tale of Mark Whiticare (Matt Damon), a rising-exec at Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), a company that makes additives for food and beverages. [Read more...]
Recent Comments